We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Case regulation is specific to the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an example, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not usually be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of the boy or Lady never approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they could do if they can Reduce off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by legislation.
Ordinarily, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (together with All those in very clear violation of set up case regulation) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case is not really appealed, the decision will stand.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Obviously distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion consists of a move to a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, gives financial relief by inserting an employee inside of a higher pay scale, without modifying their career duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained during the same pay back scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they deficiency opportunities for promotion. Upgradation is actually a policy Resource used to ease the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it's actually really imprecise about whether the ninety-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based about the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held into the 90-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it can be effortless for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to dispose of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has attained to your stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it has attained these types of stage. Read more
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common legislation, is really a regulation that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, relatively than legislation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character more info previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair for the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its primary purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more